<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Chasing the Wind</title>
	<link>http://chasingthewind.net</link>
	<description>News. Nonsense. Faith.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 23:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dale Earnhardt, Jr.&#8217;s Girlfriend by cdb</title>
		<link>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/07/19/dale-earnhardt-jrs-girlfriend/#comment-43910</link>
		<author>cdb</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/07/19/dale-earnhardt-jrs-girlfriend/#comment-43910</guid>
					<description>hold the presses jr dating a brunette that was in daytona with him...lol this is to funny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hold the presses jr dating a brunette that was in daytona with him&#8230;lol this is to funny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dale Earnhardt, Jr.&#8217;s Girlfriend by cdb</title>
		<link>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/07/19/dale-earnhardt-jrs-girlfriend/#comment-43907</link>
		<author>cdb</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/07/19/dale-earnhardt-jrs-girlfriend/#comment-43907</guid>
					<description>okay that is right</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>okay that is right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dale Earnhardt, Jr.&#8217;s Girlfriend by Michael</title>
		<link>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/07/19/dale-earnhardt-jrs-girlfriend/#comment-43906</link>
		<author>Michael</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/07/19/dale-earnhardt-jrs-girlfriend/#comment-43906</guid>
					<description>cdb, I'm not nearly amusing as those who post on this message.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cdb, I&#8217;m not nearly amusing as those who post on this message.  <img src='http://chasingthewind.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dale Earnhardt, Jr.&#8217;s Girlfriend by cdb</title>
		<link>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/07/19/dale-earnhardt-jrs-girlfriend/#comment-43905</link>
		<author>cdb</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/07/19/dale-earnhardt-jrs-girlfriend/#comment-43905</guid>
					<description>now it is Lindsey something who works at nascar.lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now it is Lindsey something who works at nascar.lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dale Earnhardt, Jr.&#8217;s Girlfriend by cdb</title>
		<link>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/07/19/dale-earnhardt-jrs-girlfriend/#comment-43904</link>
		<author>cdb</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/07/19/dale-earnhardt-jrs-girlfriend/#comment-43904</guid>
					<description>love your since of humor Michael..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love your since of humor Michael..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dale Earnhardt, Jr.&#8217;s Girlfriend by Michael</title>
		<link>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/07/19/dale-earnhardt-jrs-girlfriend/#comment-43902</link>
		<author>Michael</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/07/19/dale-earnhardt-jrs-girlfriend/#comment-43902</guid>
					<description>A nightstand?  Dale Jr is worth a piece of furniture?  Would he be worth a kitchen table?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nightstand?  Dale Jr is worth a piece of furniture?  Would he be worth a kitchen table?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dale Earnhardt, Jr.&#8217;s Girlfriend by bonnie</title>
		<link>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/07/19/dale-earnhardt-jrs-girlfriend/#comment-43901</link>
		<author>bonnie</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chasingthewind.net/2004/07/19/dale-earnhardt-jrs-girlfriend/#comment-43901</guid>
					<description>dale jr is so drop dead georgus and he is so hot he would be worth a one night stand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dale jr is so drop dead georgus and he is so hot he would be worth a one night stand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fruitcake Interpretation of the Bible by Michael</title>
		<link>http://chasingthewind.net/2008/06/24/fruitcake-interpretation-of-the-bible/#comment-43900</link>
		<author>Michael</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chasingthewind.net/2008/06/24/fruitcake-interpretation-of-the-bible/#comment-43900</guid>
					<description>Wow, that's an incredible and insulting conspiracy, CurtJ.  We "religious idiots" will pray for you and others like you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that&#8217;s an incredible and insulting conspiracy, CurtJ.  We &#8220;religious idiots&#8221; will pray for you and others like you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fruitcake Interpretation of the Bible by CurtJ</title>
		<link>http://chasingthewind.net/2008/06/24/fruitcake-interpretation-of-the-bible/#comment-43899</link>
		<author>CurtJ</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 03:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chasingthewind.net/2008/06/24/fruitcake-interpretation-of-the-bible/#comment-43899</guid>
					<description>The Republican Party is not the same party my grampa belonged to. Not since the 1960's when the Dixiecrats jumped over to the Republicans when the Democrats had a shot of conscience and remorse and passed the American Civil Rights Act.. And brought with them, their greed, avarice and racism... which attracted the Neo Cons who snookered the Dixiecrats who didn't realize they were outclassed and replaced in the Republican Party.. The Neo Cons in turn needed more votes to take over the Presidency and Senate.. So with a series of deliberatew wedge issues, they attracted the religious Idiots who practice a philosophy completely 180 degrees opposite of what the white mans Jesus lived and breathed.
 So that's where the 11-21% of Americans are... Neo Con Parasites, Republican Mushrooms and Religious Idiots.
 And the Neo Con United States Supreme Court Justices are set toe re-interpret the same United States Constitution.. To reflect and legalize the ideals, policies and philosophies of the Neo Cons.. That only 11-215of Americans support. Hope you Treasonous Scumbags are ready to defend that when the rest of America wakes up!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican Party is not the same party my grampa belonged to. Not since the 1960&#8217;s when the Dixiecrats jumped over to the Republicans when the Democrats had a shot of conscience and remorse and passed the American Civil Rights Act.. And brought with them, their greed, avarice and racism&#8230; which attracted the Neo Cons who snookered the Dixiecrats who didn&#8217;t realize they were outclassed and replaced in the Republican Party.. The Neo Cons in turn needed more votes to take over the Presidency and Senate.. So with a series of deliberatew wedge issues, they attracted the religious Idiots who practice a philosophy completely 180 degrees opposite of what the white mans Jesus lived and breathed.<br />
 So that&#8217;s where the 11-21% of Americans are&#8230; Neo Con Parasites, Republican Mushrooms and Religious Idiots.<br />
 And the Neo Con United States Supreme Court Justices are set toe re-interpret the same United States Constitution.. To reflect and legalize the ideals, policies and philosophies of the Neo Cons.. That only 11-215of Americans support. Hope you Treasonous Scumbags are ready to defend that when the rest of America wakes up!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fruitcake Interpretation of the Bible by Michael</title>
		<link>http://chasingthewind.net/2008/06/24/fruitcake-interpretation-of-the-bible/#comment-43898</link>
		<author>Michael</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chasingthewind.net/2008/06/24/fruitcake-interpretation-of-the-bible/#comment-43898</guid>
					<description>I don't understand the analogy, but I can address the argument.  The Old Testament is important - it shows us the law that convicts us, it shows God's character and how He views sin and reveals His perfect love an djustice, and it shows man's utter inability to follow the simplest laws of a lving God, and it provides fulfilled prophecy to demonstrate the need for a savior and the evidence to show that Jesus fulfills those prophecies.  

It's only the laws of the Old Testament that were fulfilled by Jesus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand the analogy, but I can address the argument.  The Old Testament is important - it shows us the law that convicts us, it shows God&#8217;s character and how He views sin and reveals His perfect love an djustice, and it shows man&#8217;s utter inability to follow the simplest laws of a lving God, and it provides fulfilled prophecy to demonstrate the need for a savior and the evidence to show that Jesus fulfills those prophecies.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s only the laws of the Old Testament that were fulfilled by Jesus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fruitcake Interpretation of the Bible by Richard</title>
		<link>http://chasingthewind.net/2008/06/24/fruitcake-interpretation-of-the-bible/#comment-43897</link>
		<author>Richard</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://chasingthewind.net/2008/06/24/fruitcake-interpretation-of-the-bible/#comment-43897</guid>
					<description>People that say the old testament no longer applies are like alcoholics on the wagon, but who  still keep a liquor cabinet stocked with all their favorite booze. If the old testament no longer applies would it not be better to redact the bible and get rid of what doesn't apply anymore? Or, at least put the following statement in the Bible:

We include the old Testament solely for historical reference. Nothing in the old testament laws are effective anymore because Jesus says so.  

Otherwise too many people will fall off the wagon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People that say the old testament no longer applies are like alcoholics on the wagon, but who  still keep a liquor cabinet stocked with all their favorite booze. If the old testament no longer applies would it not be better to redact the bible and get rid of what doesn&#8217;t apply anymore? Or, at least put the following statement in the Bible:</p>
<p>We include the old Testament solely for historical reference. Nothing in the old testament laws are effective anymore because Jesus says so.  </p>
<p>Otherwise too many people will fall off the wagon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
