Yesterday, the 1st Court of Appeals heard arguments about Houston’s conflicting Proposition 1 and Proposition 2.
Here’s the recap: Houston votors gethered enough petitions to force a city-wide vote on a proposition to cap the growth of city government. The city didn’t like it, but eventually gave in and listed it on the ballot as Proposition 2. For Proposition 1, the city offered a similar sounding proposition that not only had no teeth, but also contained wording to kill the voter-initiated Proposition 2. Both passed.
The city claims they don’t have to implement Proposition 2 because Proposition 1 passed. Houston voters are suing, the city is using tax dollars to hir attorneys to fight the citizens.
Why did the city do this? It’s obvious:
[Mayor Bill] White put Proposition 1 on the November ballot specifically to try to defeat Proposition 2., saying Proposition 2 would be detrimental to city finances.
Well, duh. That was the whole point of Proposition 2.
I voted against Bill White in the last mayoral election. I’m voting against him next time, too.

Leave a comment